Key Takeaways
- Solar tax credits can provide significant tax savings, especially when combined with depreciation
- Many promoted solar “leaseback” structures fail because the activity becomes passive
- Tax strategies should support a real investment—not replace one
In this episode of the Major League Real Estate Podcast, Nathan Sosa and Matt Hamilton break down how solar tax credits work in commercial real estate—and where investors get into trouble chasing tax savings without understanding the rules. They walk through the 30% Investment Tax Credit (ITC), how bonus depreciation layers in, why many promoted structures fail, and how to properly use tax credits in syndications.
Tax Credits vs. Deductions: Why It Matters
Nathan starts by clarifying a key concept: tax credits are not the same as deductions.
Deductions reduce your taxable income, meaning the benefit depends on your tax rate. Credits, on the other hand, reduce your tax bill dollar-for-dollar. That makes credits significantly more powerful—but also more misunderstood.
For solar, the Investment Tax Credit (ITC) allows investors to claim roughly 30% of the project cost as a direct tax credit. So a $100,000 solar installation could generate a $30,000 reduction in tax liability.
How Solar Creates Both Credits and Deductions
Where solar becomes especially attractive is when you combine the credit with depreciation.
Nathan explains that while you do have to reduce your depreciable basis, the reduction is only 50% of the credit amount, not the full credit. That allows investors to still take a large depreciation deduction on top of the credit.
In practice, this means:
- You receive a 30% tax credit, and
- You still deduct most of the remaining cost through depreciation
When combined, this can significantly increase total tax savings relative to the original investment.
The Real Cost: It’s Not Just a Tax Strategy
Matt highlights an important point: solar projects still have real costs and operational considerations.
Depending on the size of the installation, you may need engineering studies or technical validation to ensure the system qualifies under current rules. These costs, along with installation and financing, need to be factored into the overall return.
In other words, this is still an investment—not just a tax play.
Where Solar Tax Credit Schemes Go Wrong
A major focus of the episode is the rise of promoted “solar tax strategies” that don’t hold up under scrutiny.
The common structure looks like this:
- You purchase solar equipment
- A third-party promoter or manager leases it out
- You’re promised tax credits, depreciation, and active income offsets
The problem? The activity is usually passive.
Because a management company is handling the operations, the IRS treats the activity as passive. That means:
- The tax credits are passive
- The depreciation losses are passive
- You cannot use them against active income
For high-income earners trying to offset W-2 income or business income, this completely undermines the strategy.
Why Material Participation Still Matters
Nathan emphasizes that material participation is the key hurdle.
Promoters often claim they can “get you to 100 hours,” but in reality, if a third party is running the operation, it’s extremely difficult to meet IRS standards.
Without real involvement:
- The activity defaults to passive
- The tax benefits are deferred
- The immediate value disappears
While there may be edge cases where this can work, most investors will not meet the requirements in these promoted structures.
Partnership Flip Structures: Where Credits Actually Work
The episode also contrasts risky structures with legitimate use cases.
In commercial real estate, tax credits are often used in partnership flip structures, commonly seen in:
- Low-income housing
- Historic rehabilitation projects
- Solar developments
In these deals:
- Investors contribute capital primarily for tax benefits
- Operators focus on cash flow and execution
- Ownership “flips” over time as credits are allocated
These structures work because they are:
- Properly designed
- Backed by real business activity
- Aligned with IRS rules
Passive Losses Aren’t Lost—They’re Deferred
One important clarification is that passive losses and credits are not wasted—they are deferred.
If you can’t use them today, they may:
- Offset future passive income
- Be released when a property is sold
This makes solar and other credit strategies part of a longer-term tax planning approach, rather than an immediate tax solution.
Final Thoughts
The biggest takeaway from the episode is simple:
Don’t let the tax tail wag the economic dog.
Solar tax credits can be a powerful tool when used correctly—especially when paired with real estate and structured properly. But when investors chase tax savings without understanding passive activity rules, material participation, or deal economics, they risk ending up with benefits they can’t use.
The best approach is to:
- Start with a solid investment
- Layer in tax strategy
- Ensure the structure actually works under IRS rules
If done correctly, solar can enhance returns. If done incorrectly, it can create unnecessary complexity—and potential audit risk.
Interested in working with tax experts? Schedule a discovery call with our firm.
Disclaimer: This podcast summary was generated from the transcript and may contain some errors or miss key points from the audio recording. Any mention of third-party vendors, products, or services does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation. You should conduct your own due diligence before engaging with any vendor.
Reinvesting Management Fees: When It’s Taxable vs. Tax-Free
March 19, 2026Tax Strategies for Dentists Who Invest in Real Estate
August 6, 2026




![Walkthrough: How a Short-Term Rental Investment Can Result in BIG Tax Savings [Tax Smart Daily 060]](https://hallcpa.devstagings.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/img-blog-49-optimized.webp)
![How to Claim Tax Losses Even When You Put $0 Into a Deal [Tax Smart Daily 059]](https://hallcpa.devstagings.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/ts-daily-59-optimized.webp)